Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unmount c/storage containers before removing them #7383

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 20, 2020

Conversation

mheon
Copy link
Member

@mheon mheon commented Aug 19, 2020

When podman rmi --force is run, it will remove any containers that depend on the image. This includes Podman containers, but also any other c/storage users who may be using it. With Podman containers, we use the standard Podman removal function for containers, which handles all edge cases nicely, shutting down running containers, ensuring they're unmounted, etc.

Unfortunately, no such convient function exists (or can exist) for all c/storage containers. Identifying the PID of a Buildah, CRI-O, or Podman container is extremely different, and those are just the implementations under the containers org. We can't reasonably be able to know if a c/storage container is in use and safe for removal if it's not a Podman container.

At the very least, though, we can attempt to unmount a storage container before removing it. If it is in use, this will fail (probably with a not-particularly-helpful error message), but if it is not in use but not fully cleaned up, this should make our removing it much more robust than it normally is.

When `podman rmi --force` is run, it will remove any containers
that depend on the image. This includes Podman containers, but
also any other c/storage users who may be using it. With Podman
containers, we use the standard Podman removal function for
containers, which handles all edge cases nicely, shutting down
running containers, ensuring they're unmounted, etc.

Unfortunately, no such convient function exists (or can exist)
for all c/storage containers. Identifying the PID of a Buildah,
CRI-O, or Podman container is extremely different, and those are
just the implementations under the containers org. We can't
reasonably be able to know if a c/storage container is *in use*
and safe for removal if it's not a Podman container.

At the very least, though, we can attempt to unmount a storage
container before removing it. If it is in use, this will fail
(probably with a not-particularly-helpful error message), but if
it is not in use but not fully cleaned up, this should make our
removing it much more robust than it normally is.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 19, 2020
@mheon
Copy link
Member Author

mheon commented Aug 19, 2020

@nalind @rhatdan @vrothberg @baude PTAL

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM (restarted the flake)

@vrothberg
Copy link
Member

@giuseppe PTAL

Copy link
Member

@giuseppe giuseppe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 20, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe, mheon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 7865db5 into containers:master Aug 20, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 24, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 24, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants