Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace deepcopy on history results #7247

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 11, 2020

Conversation

baude
Copy link
Member

@baude baude commented Aug 6, 2020

the deepcopy in the remote history code path was throwing an uncaught error on a type mismatch. we now manually do the conversion and fix the type mismatch on the fly.

Fixes: #7122

Signed-off-by: Brent Baude [email protected]

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: baude

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 6, 2020
@baude baude self-assigned this Aug 6, 2020
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Aug 6, 2020

LGTM

1 similar comment
@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Aug 7, 2020

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 7, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 7, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 10, 2020
the deepcopy in the remote history code path was throwing an uncaught error on a type mismatch.  we now manually do the conversion and fix the type mismatch on the fly.

Fixes: containers#7122

Signed-off-by: Brent Baude <[email protected]>
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Aug 11, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 11, 2020
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Aug 11, 2020

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 11, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 8eaacec into containers:master Aug 11, 2020
@baude baude deleted the issue7122 branch May 18, 2022 15:19
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 21, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

podman-remote: history: results inconsistent with non-remote podman
6 participants