Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rework label parsing #5217

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2020

Conversation

mheon
Copy link
Member

@mheon mheon commented Feb 14, 2020

We attempted to share all logic for parsing labels and environment variables, which on the surface makes lots of sense (both are formatted key=value so parsing logic should be identical) but has begun to fall apart now that we have added additional logic to environment variable handling. Environment variables that are unset, for example, are looked up against environment variables set for the process. We don't want this for labels, so we have to split parsing logic.

Fixes #3854

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mheon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M labels Feb 14, 2020
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Feb 14, 2020

label.patch.txt
Please add these tests.

@mheon mheon force-pushed the rework_label_parsing branch from 71b4022 to fcb435f Compare February 14, 2020 20:58
@mheon
Copy link
Member Author

mheon commented Feb 14, 2020

Was adding tests while you were typing - is that one enough, or should I expand?

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Feb 14, 2020

If you have a case that I don't handle, then add it. But if this is enough, then just take them.

We attempted to share all logic for parsing labels and
environment variables, which on the surface makes lots of sense
(both are formatted key=value so parsing logic should be
identical) but has begun to fall apart now that we have added
additional logic to environment variable handling. Environment
variables that are unset, for example, are looked up against
environment variables set for the process. We don't want this for
labels, so we have to split parsing logic.

Fixes containers#3854

Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <[email protected]>
@mheon mheon force-pushed the rework_label_parsing branch from c62fc41 to 36a0ed9 Compare February 14, 2020 21:06
@mheon
Copy link
Member Author

mheon commented Feb 14, 2020

Tests added and green

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

LGTM, nice work @mheon

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Feb 15, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 15, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 92dbcb8 into containers:master Feb 15, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 25, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 25, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Podman ignores labels that are key only
5 participants