-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CI:DOCS] Spec proposal #5082
[CI:DOCS] Spec proposal #5082
Conversation
The current Libpod pkg/spec has become a victim of the better part of three years of development that tied it extremely closely to the current Podman CLI. Defaults are spread across multiple places, there is no easy way to produce a CreateConfig that will actually produce a valid container, and the logic for generating configs has sprawled across at least three packages. This is an initial pass at a package that generates OCI specs that will supersede large parts of the current pkg/spec. The CreateConfig will still exist, but will effectively turn into a parsed CLI. This will be compiled down into the new SpecGenerator struct, which will generate the OCI spec and Libpod create options. The preferred integration point for plugging into Podman's Go API to create containers will be the new CreateConfig, as it's less tied to Podman's command line. CRI-O, for example, will likely tie in here. Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <[email protected]>
pkg/specgen/specgen.go
Outdated
// ContainerHealthCheckConfig describes a container healthcheck with attributes | ||
// like command, retries, interval, start period, and timeout. | ||
type ContainerHealthCheckConfig struct { | ||
manifest.Schema2HealthConfig `json:"healthcheck,omitempty"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we want to give this a name? In case we add extra fields related to healthchecks at some point?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mheon i couldnt think of a name that wasnt redundant. you?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
...HealthConfig? Maybe?
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: baude The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
warning: the naming of this might change as well as the location. this is a build on a PR from mheon from last year that proposes a shift from our current approach of creating containers based on the arbitrarily made createconfig. the new approach would be to have a specification that is detached from the podman cli. the spec could then be generated and used to make a container. this theoretically is the beginning of a long-needed refactor involving how we get from the cli -> libpod | apiv2 -> libpod with code re-use and less duplication. the intent is to build the apiv2 container creation based on this approach only. wiring to the podman cli will happen after the fact. Signed-off-by: Brent Baude <[email protected]>
updated |
Current version LGTM, we can discuss further details as the implementation comes together |
/lgtm |
warning: the naming of this might change as well as the location.
this is a build on a PR from mheon from last year that proposes a shift from our current approach of creating containers based on the arbitrarily made createconfig. the new approach would be to have a specification that is detached from the podman cli. the spec could then be generated and used to make a container. this theoretically is the beginning of a long-needed refactor involving how we get from the cli -> libpod | apiv2 -> libpod with code re-use and less duplication.
the intent is to build the apiv2 container creation based on this approach only. wiring to the podman cli will happen after the fact.