Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor network commands #4757

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 31, 2019

Conversation

baude
Copy link
Member

@baude baude commented Dec 28, 2019

move core of network commands from pkg/adapter to pkg/network to assist
with api development and remote podman commands.

Signed-off-by: baude [email protected]

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: baude

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/L labels Dec 28, 2019
pkg/network/network.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/adapter/network.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/adapter/network.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/adapter/network.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
move core of network commands from pkg/adapter to pkg/network to assist
with api development and remote podman commands.

Signed-off-by: baude <[email protected]>
@baude baude requested review from mheon and removed request for mrunalp December 29, 2019 20:40
@baude
Copy link
Member Author

baude commented Dec 29, 2019

this is blocking apiv2 work. please review and merge

}

// InspectNetwork reads a CNI config and returns its configuration
func InspectNetwork(name string) (map[string]interface{}, error) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we return anything better than this? I know that CNI doesn't bother exporting most types, but can we potentially provide some sort of struct defining what contents could be?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is really too loosely defined to do much more. I don't like it either.

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Dec 29, 2019

@baude I mean, it is Sunday of shutdown 😄

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Dec 30, 2019 via email

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Dec 31, 2019

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 31, 2019
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 6a370cb into containers:master Dec 31, 2019
@baude baude deleted the networkrefactor branch May 7, 2020 13:11
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 25, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 25, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants