Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rootless: allow cgroupfs manager on cgroups v2 #4171

Merged

Conversation

giuseppe
Copy link
Member

@giuseppe giuseppe commented Oct 2, 2019

if there are no resources specified, make sure the OCI resources block
is empty so that the OCI runtime won't complain.

Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano [email protected]

if there are no resources specified, make sure the OCI resources block
is empty so that the OCI runtime won't complain.

Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XS labels Oct 2, 2019
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Oct 2, 2019

Does this need to be in RC1? Should I recreate the PR/tag?

@giuseppe
Copy link
Member Author

giuseppe commented Oct 2, 2019

Does this need to be in RC1? Should I recreate the PR/tag?

yes please, this is the issue we were discussing earlier that existing containers where manager=cgorupfs will not work otherwise.

It was reported for crun as well: containers/crun#118

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Oct 2, 2019

Code LGTM

@baude
Copy link
Member

baude commented Oct 2, 2019

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 2, 2019
@baude
Copy link
Member

baude commented Oct 2, 2019

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 2, 2019
@mheon mheon mentioned this pull request Oct 2, 2019
Copy link
Member

@TomSweeneyRedHat TomSweeneyRedHat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@giuseppe
Copy link
Member Author

giuseppe commented Oct 2, 2019

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 2, 2019
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit dac7889 into containers:master Oct 2, 2019
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 26, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 26, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants