Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

info: add cgroups2 #4141

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2019

Conversation

giuseppe
Copy link
Member

Closes: #4080

Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano [email protected]

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 30, 2019
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Sep 30, 2019 via email

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

libpod/info.go Outdated
if err != nil {
return nil, errors.Wrapf(err, "error reading cgroups mode")
}
info["cgroupv2"] = unified
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cgroup2? cgroupv2?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we should set this to a string instead - "cgroupmode" = "v2" or "v1"?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

legacy/hybrid/unified?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i like the idea from @mheon

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the issue is that currently we have only code to detect the unified mode (that is cgroups v2). Should we probably rename it to "cgroups-unified-mode"?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Users understand cgroups V1 and V2, I don't want the "unified" mode exposed. When I see unified, I get confused and think it is a mode that covers both V1 and V2.

"CgroupVersion" = V2

That way 5 years from now when V3 is all the rage ...

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed to be "CgroupVersion" = "v1" | "v2"

Closes: containers#4080

Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]>
@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

LGTM assuming happy tests

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Sep 30, 2019

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 30, 2019
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 5702dd7 into containers:master Sep 30, 2019
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 26, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 26, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

podman info display cgroups version
9 participants