Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

podman cp: big set of system tests #3887

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2019

Conversation

edsantiago
Copy link
Member

podman cp has had some unexpected bugs, and still has
some surprising behavior. It looks like this part of
the code is fragile. Add tests to try to prevent
future breakages.

Note that two of the new tests are disabled (skipped)
until #3829 gets fixed.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago [email protected]

podman cp has had some unexpected bugs, and still has
some surprising behavior. It looks like this part of
the code is fragile. Add tests to try to prevent
future breakages.

Note that two of the new tests are disabled (skipped)
until containers#3829 gets fixed.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <[email protected]>
@edsantiago
Copy link
Member Author

Please note that the "weird symlink expansion" test elicits what I believe to be incorrect behavior. I'm getting more and more tempted to file an issue on it.

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Aug 26, 2019

LGTM
@QiWang19 PTAL

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Aug 26, 2019

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 26, 2019
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Aug 26, 2019

LGTM! Many thanks Ed.

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Aug 26, 2019

(Maybe we should have @jwhonce cherry-pick this on top of the symlink globbing PR before we merge it, to make sure everything passes there?)

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @mheon and @rhatdan. Could I pretty-please ask someone for an opinion on that "weird" test case though? Should I file an issue?

have @jwhonce cherry-pick this on top of the symlink globbing PR

Jhon's PR addresses one of the skipped tests, but not (last time I checked) the other one. I think that was a difficult one.

}


function teardown() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure if we have one, but if not, could you add a test where you copy a file from the host and the target is a symlink in the container? The file is then visible at the symlinks target in the container, but is not seen on the host? Especially in the corresponding directory on the host? i.e symlink in the container for /test->//tmp then after 'cp mytestfile ctr:/test', the mytestfile doesn't show up in /tmp on the host too (or instead).

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is two of the three paths in the "weird" test

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Aug 27, 2019

LGTM
@TomSweeneyRedHat @mheon @baude @vrothberg @giuseppe I think we should get these tests in.

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

LGTM and it looks like @edsantiago opened an issue for the findings he was questioning. I think that's the right approach.

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

I love the comments in the tests. It's a great example how future tests can look like 👍

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: edsantiago, mheon, vrothberg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@vrothberg
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 28, 2019
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a1a1342 into containers:master Aug 28, 2019
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 26, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 26, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants