Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure that we make a netns for CNI non-default nets #2796

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 29, 2019

Conversation

mheon
Copy link
Member

@mheon mheon commented Mar 28, 2019

We accidentally patched this out trying to enable ns:/path/to/ns, I think.

This should restore the ability to configure nondefault CNI networks with Podman, by ensuring that they request creation of a network namespace.

Completely remove the WithNetNS() call when we do use an explicit namespace from a path. We use that call to indicate that a netns is going to be created - there should not be any question about whether it actually does.

Fixes #2795

We accidentally patched this out trying to enable ns:/path/to/ns

This should restore the ability to configure nondefault CNI
networks with Podman, by ensuring that they request creation of a
network namespace.

Completely remove the WithNetNS() call when we do use an explicit
namespace from a path. We use that call to indicate that a netns
is going to be created - there should not be any question about
whether it actually does.

Fixes containers#2795

Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mheon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M labels Mar 28, 2019
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <[email protected]>
@giuseppe
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Mar 29, 2019

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 29, 2019
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 6ab27c6 into containers:master Mar 29, 2019
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 26, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 26, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants