Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ExitWithError() - more upgrades from Exit() #22987

Merged

Conversation

edsantiago
Copy link
Member

Add error-message checks to pod_xxxx_test.go

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago [email protected]

None

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added release-note-none approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jun 12, 2024
@edsantiago edsantiago marked this pull request as draft June 12, 2024 17:46
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 12, 2024
@edsantiago
Copy link
Member Author

Draft, because I don't think it'll pass CI (network error message diffs). Also, maybe #22986 will be fixed by the time I get back from PTO.

@edsantiago edsantiago force-pushed the exitwitherror-yetmore branch from f102269 to a350d3a Compare June 12, 2024 19:01
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Jun 13, 2024

LGTM

Add error-message checks to pod_xxxx_test.go

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <[email protected]>
@edsantiago edsantiago force-pushed the exitwitherror-yetmore branch from a350d3a to d810f41 Compare June 21, 2024 12:26
@edsantiago edsantiago marked this pull request as ready for review June 21, 2024 12:35
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 21, 2024
@edsantiago
Copy link
Member Author

This is ready. Rather than wait for #22986 and #22989, let's merge this now. Then whoever fixes those will have an almost-zero-effort test ready for them.

Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 24, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: edsantiago, Luap99

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 7b4f6ec into containers:main Jun 24, 2024
90 checks passed
@edsantiago edsantiago deleted the exitwitherror-yetmore branch June 24, 2024 11:17
@stale-locking-app stale-locking-app bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 23, 2024
@stale-locking-app stale-locking-app bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 23, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants