Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tmpfs should not be mounted noexec #19887

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2023

Conversation

rhatdan
Copy link
Member

@rhatdan rhatdan commented Sep 7, 2023

The logic here makes little sense, basically the /tmp and /var/tmp are always set noexec, while /run is not. I don't see a reason to set any of the three noexec by default.

Fixes: #19886

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

/tmp and /var/tmp inside of a podman kube play will no longer be `noexec`

The logic here makes little sense, basically the /tmp and /var/tmp are
always set noexec, while /run is not.  I don't see a reason to set any
of the three noexec by default.

Fixes: containers#19886

Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Enforce release-note requirement, even if just None approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Sep 7, 2023
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Looks like an unintended bi-product of commit 338b283.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 7, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rhatdan, vrothberg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added release-note and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Enforce release-note requirement, even if just None labels Sep 7, 2023
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member Author

rhatdan commented Sep 7, 2023

@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

@baude
Copy link
Member

baude commented Sep 7, 2023

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 7, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 16f2dd3 into containers:main Sep 7, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Dec 7, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 7, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Is it possible to have execute permissions on /tmp for kube play created pods?
4 participants