Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use constants for mount types #19241

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 14, 2023
Merged

Conversation

rhatdan
Copy link
Member

@rhatdan rhatdan commented Jul 14, 2023

Inspired by #19238

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 14, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 14, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the kind/api-change Change to remote API; merits scrutiny label Jul 14, 2023
Inspired by containers#19238

Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <[email protected]>
@@ -1962,7 +1962,7 @@ func (c *Container) makeBindMounts() error {
case m.Destination == "/run/.containerenv":
hasRunContainerenv = true
break Loop
case m.Destination == "/run" && m.Source != "tmpfs":
case m.Destination == "/run" && m.Source != define.TypeTmpfs:
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 Jul 14, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not related to this change this must compare m.Type

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Luap99 im going to merge this ... do you wanna make a quick pr afterwards to fix this?

@baude
Copy link
Member

baude commented Jul 14, 2023

/hold
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Jul 14, 2023
@Luap99
Copy link
Member

Luap99 commented Jul 14, 2023

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 14, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit d1ddd03 into containers:main Jul 14, 2023
rhatdan added a commit to rhatdan/podman that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2023
Paul found this in containers#19241

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <[email protected]>
dfr added a commit to dfr/common that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2023
This fixes a regression in
containers/podman#19241 which quite reasonably
assumed that the default image volume mode from pkg/config was correct.

Signed-off-by: Doug Rabson <[email protected]>
dfr added a commit to dfr/common that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2023
This fixes a regression in
containers/podman#19241 which quite reasonably
assumed that the default image volume mode from pkg/config was correct.

Signed-off-by: Doug Rabson <[email protected]>
@ashley-cui ashley-cui added the 4.6 label Jul 20, 2023
ashley-cui pushed a commit to ashley-cui/podman that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2023
Paul found this in containers#19241

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <[email protected]>
dfr added a commit to dfr/common that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2023
This fixes a regression in
containers/podman#19241 which quite reasonably
assumed that the default image volume mode from pkg/config was correct.

Signed-off-by: Doug Rabson <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Oct 19, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 19, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/api-change Change to remote API; merits scrutiny lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants