Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use /proc/self/gid_map as intended, not uid_map #19062

Merged

Conversation

Luminger
Copy link
Contributor

@Luminger Luminger commented Jun 30, 2023

GetKeepIDMapping never read the gid (as it intended) but reused the uid. Most likely a typo that never bothered anybody as uid and gid usually match.

I stumbled across this by accident and figured I can just fix it along the way, even though I was not hit by that bug :)

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jun 30, 2023

/approve
LGTM
Please repush to get passed the tests requirement.

git commit -a --amend -s
git push --force

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 30, 2023
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jun 30, 2023

Thanks @Luminger

GetKeepIDMapping never read the gid (as it intended) but reused the uid.
Most likely a typo that never bothered anybody as uid and gid usually
match.

Signed-off-by: Simon Brakhane <[email protected]>
@Luminger Luminger force-pushed the fix-use-gid-map-not-uid-map branch from d61a7e7 to 94e59bd Compare June 30, 2023 10:58
@ashley-cui
Copy link
Member

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 30, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 30, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99, Luminger, rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ashley-cui
Copy link
Member

/cherry-pick v4.6

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@ashley-cui: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of v4.6 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick v4.6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 82af41c into containers:main Jun 30, 2023
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@ashley-cui: new pull request created: #19071

In response to this:

/cherry-pick v4.6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Luminger Luminger deleted the fix-use-gid-map-not-uid-map branch June 30, 2023 13:49
peterzam added a commit to peterzam/box that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 28, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 28, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants