-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
remote wait: fix "removed" condition #18912
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not so sure about this, I would assume to have removed
wait for the container to be removed not only exited.
Very fair point. I was totally focused on the exit code. I'll extend the code and tests. |
The "removed" condition mapped to an undefined state which ultimately rendered the wait endpoint to return an incorrect exit code. Instead, map "removed" to "exited" to make sure Podman returns the expected exit code. Fixes: containers#18889 Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
@Luap99 PTanotherL. It looks a bit clunky but the entire compat wait code is one big spaghetti and I refrained from rewriting it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: flouthoc, vrothberg The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Ready to merge |
/lgtm |
/hold cancel |
The "removed" condition mapped to an undefined state which ultimately rendered the wait endpoint to return an incorrect exit code. Instead, map "removed" to "exited" to make sure Podman returns the expected exit code.
Fixes: #18889
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?