-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
play.go: remove volumes with kube down --force
#18814
play.go: remove volumes with kube down --force
#18814
Conversation
ba55359
to
0830ffc
Compare
/approve |
d24e111
to
5709755
Compare
All kinds of red tests @danishprakash |
3e1a5f7
to
99ad806
Compare
Yeah, I was trying to work around the fact that the volumes created by podman are named differently than what's specified in the k8s manifest. The current solution is in alignment with how we create volumes out of the manifest. But in the longer run, I believe KubeVolume could have a Name attribute which would be the direct equivalent of the volume name in the k8s manifest. That is of course, I'm missing out on a specific design decision that involved using Source as the volume name for all kinds of volumes (the current implementation). |
Should we change the naming of kubernetes volumes to match kubernetes? |
I would say yes, should that come under the scope of this PR or another? I think for the issue this was opened, this change is sufficient. PTAL. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One nit on the test, other than that LGTM
@Luap99 PTAL
a88e761
to
23050a5
Compare
* add e2e test Signed-off-by: danishprakash <[email protected]>
23050a5
to
ba3da15
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@Luap99 PTAL
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: baude, danishprakash, Luap99 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Closes #18797
Signed-off-by: danishprakash [email protected]