Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

netavark: only use aardvark ip as nameserver #17578

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2023

Conversation

Luap99
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 commented Feb 20, 2023

Since commit 0624107 we use the aardvark per container dns functionality. This means we should only have the aardvark ip in resolv.conf otherwise the client resolver could skip aardvark, thus ignoring the special dns option for this container.

Fixes #17499

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

podman run --dns ... --network ... will no longer add host nameservers to resolv.conf when aardvark-dns is used.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 20, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 20, 2023
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
@edsantiago PTAL

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

LGTM. The surrounding tests could use some cleanup, but not worth a repush

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

tests failing. network disconnect looks like it needs a netavark special-case; the ithers, no idea.

Since commit 0624107 we use the aardvark per container dns
functionality. This means we should only have the aardvark ip in
resolv.conf otherwise the client resolver could skip aardvark, thus
ignoring the special dns option for this container.

Fixes containers#17499

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <[email protected]>
@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 22, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 38c9194 into containers:main Feb 22, 2023
@Luap99 Luap99 deleted the netavark-dns branch February 22, 2023 13:45
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 8, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Impossible to override container's DNS with network
4 participants