Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

journald: remove initializeJournal() #17547

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2023

Conversation

Luap99
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 commented Feb 17, 2023

This was added as hack in commit 6b06e9b because the journald logs code was not able to handle an empty journal. But since commit 767947a this is no longer the case, we correctly use the sd_journal API and know when the journal is empty.

Therefore we no longer need this hack and it should be removed because it just adds overhead and an empty journal entry for no good reason.

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

This was added as hack in commit 6b06e9b because the journald logs
code was not able to handle an empty journal. But since commit
767947a this is no longer the case, we correctly use the sd_journal
API and know when the journal is empty.

Therefore we no longer need this hack and it should be removed because
it just adds overhead and an empty journal entry for no good reason.

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added release-note-none approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Feb 17, 2023
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
Thanks! Looking at this function was on my TODO list as the useless "history" event was quite ugly.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 17, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99, vrothberg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@Luap99
Copy link
Member Author

Luap99 commented Feb 17, 2023

yeah I noticed it to when I tested a bunch of journald stuff recently so I decided to take a look why it was added and as it turns out it is no longer needed.

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Feb 19, 2023

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 19, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 1571770 into containers:main Feb 19, 2023
@Luap99 Luap99 deleted the no-init-journal branch February 20, 2023 12:20
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 9, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 9, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants