Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix != filter in volume prune #17483

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2023

Conversation

vyasgun
Copy link
Member

@vyasgun vyasgun commented Feb 13, 2023

Signed-off-by: vyasgun [email protected]

Fixes #17051

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code LGTM, thanks!

Is there an issue for this fix?

@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 13, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@flouthoc flouthoc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR LGTM but I think there is a issue in CI unrelated to this PR. Maybe something related to CI itself cc @cevich

@vrothberg
Copy link
Member

Maybe rebasing on the latest HEAD will help

@vyasgun
Copy link
Member Author

vyasgun commented Feb 13, 2023

@vrothberg Thanks for the review. I have rebased and updated the PR -- hopefully it will resolve the issue.

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 13, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 13, 2023
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member

Tests aren´t happy yet

@vyasgun
Copy link
Member Author

vyasgun commented Feb 13, 2023

Yes, it's my tests. Taking a look

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 13, 2023
@cevich
Copy link
Member

cevich commented Feb 13, 2023

Maybe something related to CI itself

I found the error in CI, yep just needed to rebase to fix that.

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 15, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 15, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: flouthoc, vrothberg, vyasgun

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@flouthoc
Copy link
Collaborator

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 15, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit cfa3811 into containers:main Feb 15, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 9, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 9, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: podman volume prune with != as filter does not work
5 participants