Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ps: get network data in batch mode #17197

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2023

Conversation

vrothberg
Copy link
Member

The network functions popped up in the CPU profiles when listing 2042 containers. Not a very realistic or common use case but a nice way to get something on the CPU profiles.

Listing 2042 containers now runs 1.54 times faster.

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg [email protected]

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added release-note-none do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. labels Jan 24, 2023
@vrothberg vrothberg marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2023 13:38
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 24, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 24, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vrothberg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 24, 2023
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

@baude @giuseppe @mheon PTAL

I have more changes in the pipeline but prefer to do them one-by-one.

@baude
Copy link
Member

baude commented Jan 24, 2023

LGTM

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jan 24, 2023

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 24, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 24, 2023
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, good idea.

One further thing that can be done is to move c.HealthCheckStatus() in the batch function. although it will require the addition of the if !c.batched { branch in this function.

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Jan 24, 2023

Concur with @Luap99, that's a good idea - no reason not to do everything under the same lock.

@baude
Copy link
Member

baude commented Jan 24, 2023

lets plan to get this in 4.4rc3 and perhaps we can cherry pick the later in the final ... also @vrothberg did mention he had other changes queued up.

@Luap99
Copy link
Member

Luap99 commented Jan 24, 2023

Test are red, looks like this causes a deadlock.

The network functions popped up in the CPU profiles when listing 2042
containers.  Not a very realistic or common use case but a nice way to
get something on the CPU profiles.

Listing 2042 containers now runs 1.54 times faster.

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 24, 2023
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

Test are red, looks like this causes a deadlock.

Was a typo fart. CI should pass now.

@Luap99
Copy link
Member

Luap99 commented Jan 24, 2023

/lgtm
/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 24, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 24, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit eefc8b6 into containers:main Jan 24, 2023
@vrothberg vrothberg deleted the ps-network branch January 25, 2023 06:05
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 14, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 14, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants