Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rootless: rename auth-scripts to preexec-hooks #17118

Conversation

giuseppe
Copy link
Member

to not give a false sense of security since these are not a security mechanism but a hook to run arbitrary code before executing a command.

Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano [email protected]

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added release-note-none approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jan 14, 2023
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jan 15, 2023

LGTM
@baude PTAL

PODMAN_AUTH_SCRIPTS_DIR=$auth_dir run_podman 42 pull foobar
PODMAN_AUTH_SCRIPTS_DIR=$auth_dir run_podman 43 pull barfoo
PODMAN_PREEXEC_HOOKS_DIR=$auth_dir run_podman 42 pull foobar
PODMAN_PREEXEC_HOOKS_DIR=$auth_dir run_podman 43 pull barfoo
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would you consider renaming the file, updating the header comments and test name, and renaming the $auth_dir variable? Otherwise future maintainers are going to be really lost.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure, renamed the script and its content.

@giuseppe giuseppe force-pushed the rename-auth-scripts-to-preexec-hooks branch from f42f827 to 8d8e80c Compare January 16, 2023 18:51
to not give a false sense of security since these are not a security
mechanism but a hook to run arbitrary code before executing a
command.

Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]>
@giuseppe giuseppe force-pushed the rename-auth-scripts-to-preexec-hooks branch from 8d8e80c to a581d2a Compare January 17, 2023 09:59
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 17, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 17, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 17, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe, vrothberg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@vrothberg
Copy link
Member

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 17, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit cf40adb into containers:main Jan 17, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 14, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 14, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants