-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CI:DOCS] Clarify secret target behavior #16743
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ashley-cui The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
9ac5ca5
to
444c41a
Compare
- `uid=0` : UID of secret. Defaults to 0. Mount secret type only. | ||
- `gid=0` : GID of secret. Defaults to 0. Mount secret type only. | ||
- `mode=0` : Mode of secret. Defaults to 0444. Mount secret type only. | ||
|
||
|
||
Examples |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Usually we do a ##
before this, and surround individual examples with triple-backticks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changed the triple backticks! I think this is under a ####
section for in a flag doc though, so I think leaving Examples as-is might be the move?
@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a nit to explain the values.
Other than that, LGTM
Add documentation on how the the target option works when adding a secret to a container Signed-off-by: Ashley Cui <[email protected]>
@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL |
/lgtm |
Add documentation on how the the target option works when adding a secret to a container
Signed-off-by: Ashley Cui [email protected]
Closes: #16649
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?