Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kube Play: fix the handling of the optional field of SecretVolumeSource #16637

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2022

Conversation

ygalblum
Copy link
Contributor

@ygalblum ygalblum commented Nov 27, 2022

If the secret exists, set optional in the KubeVolume to false to always use it
If the secret does not exist, if optional, set the same in the KubeVolume to skip it, otherwise fail

Signed-off-by: Ygal Blum [email protected]

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

No

Fix the handling of the optional field of SecretVolumeSource

Fixes #16636

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes LGTM, thanks!

Can you add a test, @ygalblum?

@ygalblum
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vrothberg I've already started working on them. I'll add them to the PR later today

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Nov 28, 2022

Looks like this needs to be gofmt

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Nov 28, 2022

LGTM
Will merge once tests pass.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 28, 2022
If the secret exists, set optional in the KubeVolume to false to always use it
If the secret does not exist, if optional, set the same in the KubeVolume to skip it, otherwise fail

Add e2e tests

Signed-off-by: Ygal Blum <[email protected]>
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 28, 2022
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Nov 28, 2022

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 28, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 28, 2022
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Nov 28, 2022

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 28, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rhatdan, ygalblum

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. release-note and removed release-note-none labels Nov 28, 2022
@ygalblum
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rhatdan All tests passed, waiting for you to remove the hold

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Nov 28, 2022

@ygalblum You can remove the hold yourself, with
/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 28, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 37563b9 into containers:main Nov 28, 2022
@ygalblum ygalblum deleted the secret_volume branch November 29, 2022 08:42
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 20, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 20, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Kube Play mishandles the Optional field in Volume of type Secret
4 participants