Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for --preserve-fds on FreeBSD for run and exec #16512

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 17, 2022

Conversation

dfr
Copy link
Contributor

@dfr dfr commented Nov 15, 2022

This mainly involved implementing enough of rootless to support IsFdInherited. The function checkExecPreserveFDs seems redundant - it repeats the work of IdFdInherited and could be removed entirely. This extra check only happens for exec, not run.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

This is needed to support --preserve-fds in create and exec.

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Doug Rabson <[email protected]>
Copy link
Collaborator

@flouthoc flouthoc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 15, 2022
Also add a FreeBSD version.

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Doug Rabson <[email protected]>
@dfr dfr force-pushed the freebsd-preserve-fds branch from a65b262 to 4c1294c Compare November 15, 2022 16:29
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Nov 15, 2022

LGTM
/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 15, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 15, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dfr, flouthoc, rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Nov 15, 2022

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 15, 2022
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, restarted flaked job

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Nov 17, 2022

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 17, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit c67a518 into containers:main Nov 17, 2022
@dfr dfr deleted the freebsd-preserve-fds branch November 18, 2022 15:19
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 20, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 20, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants