Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI:DOCS] Fix documentation on read-only-tmpfs #16374

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 3, 2022

Conversation

rhatdan
Copy link
Member

@rhatdan rhatdan commented Nov 1, 2022

Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh [email protected]

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Enforce release-note requirement, even if just None approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. release-note-none and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Enforce release-note requirement, even if just None labels Nov 1, 2022
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member Author

rhatdan commented Nov 1, 2022

@edsantiago PTAL

Copy link
Member

@edsantiago edsantiago left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM apart from the one-long-line format; I won't block over that. Thank you.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 1, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: edsantiago, rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

This protects the container's image from modification. Read-only containers may
still need to write temporary data. The best way to handle this is to mount
tmpfs directories on _/run_ and _/tmp_.
This protects the container's image from modification. By default read-only containers can write to temporary data. Podman mounts a tmpfs on /run and /tmp within the container. If the container should not write to any file system within the container, including tmpfs, set --read-only-tmpfs=false.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On second thought, though, you might want to backtick the paths, and asteriskize the option.

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

LGTM, but documentation-focused reviewers may still want the double asterisks on the --option.

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member Author

rhatdan commented Nov 2, 2022

@TomSweeneyRedHat PTAL

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 3, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 3, 2022
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member Author

rhatdan commented Nov 3, 2022

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 3, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a1fe0cd into containers:main Nov 3, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 20, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 20, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants