Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

container/pod id file: truncate instead of throwing an error #16273

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 25, 2022

Conversation

vrothberg
Copy link
Member

Truncate the container and pod ID files instead of throwing an error. The main motivation is to prevent redundant work when starting systemd units. Throwing an error when the file already exists is not preventing races or file corruptions, so let's leave that to the user which in almost all cases are generated (and tested) systemd units.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg [email protected]

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Do not throw an error but truncate existing container/pod ID files.

@alexlarsson @containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 24, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vrothberg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 24, 2022
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

@alexlarsson, if the PR makes it in, I will open a follow-up PR for Quadlet.

Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think makes sense, just some comments about the implementation.

pkg/util/utils.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/util/utils.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/util/utils.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

pkg/util/utils.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Truncate the container and pod ID files instead of throwing an error.
The main motivation is to prevent redundant work when starting systemd
units.  Throwing an error when the file already exists is not preventing
races or file corruptions, so let's leave that to the user which in
almost all cases are generated (and tested) systemd units.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

Good to merge

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Oct 25, 2022

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 25, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 86f7b99 into containers:main Oct 25, 2022
@vrothberg vrothberg deleted the cidfile branch October 25, 2022 11:35
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 20, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 20, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants