Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for 'podman pod' on FreeBSD #16083

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 10, 2022

Conversation

dfr
Copy link
Contributor

@dfr dfr commented Oct 7, 2022

This one is fairly straightforward, mainly moving cgroup management out of the common code.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

dfr added 5 commits October 7, 2022 08:26
This moves the cgroup code to pod_internal_linux.go and adds a no-op
stub for FreeBSD.

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Doug Rabson <[email protected]>
The value of p.PodSpecGen.InfraContainerSpec.ResourceLimits can be nil
on FreeBSD.

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Doug Rabson <[email protected]>
Most of the code can be shared with other unix-like platforms.

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Doug Rabson <[email protected]>
This moves the code to runtime_pod_linux.go since cgroups are
platform-specific.

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Doug Rabson <[email protected]>
[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Doug Rabson <[email protected]>
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Oct 9, 2022

/approve
LGTM

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Oct 9, 2022

@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 9, 2022
Copy link
Member

@giuseppe giuseppe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Oct 10, 2022

/lgtm
/approve

Today I discovered SavePod() exists, when it really ought not to - that functionality should not be externally exposed. I'll fix that in a separate PR once this merges.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 10, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 10, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dfr, giuseppe, mheon, rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [giuseppe,mheon,rhatdan]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit bb0b184 into containers:main Oct 10, 2022
@dfr dfr deleted the freebsd-pod branch October 10, 2022 13:46
baude added a commit to baude/podman that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2022
PR containers#16083 breaks pod creation

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Brent Baude <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 20, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 20, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants