Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for 'podman cp' on FreeBSD #15856

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 21, 2022

Conversation

dfr
Copy link
Contributor

@dfr dfr commented Sep 19, 2022

This shares most of the implementation with Linux but handling of running containers is simpler due to the single global mount namespace.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

@dfr
Copy link
Contributor Author

dfr commented Sep 19, 2022

Lint fixes

@dfr
Copy link
Contributor Author

dfr commented Sep 19, 2022

The failing test seems related to copy so I'll debug that

@dfr
Copy link
Contributor Author

dfr commented Sep 20, 2022

The failing test seems related to copy so I'll debug that

Now I'm confused. I haven't been able to reproduce this locally, assuming that 'make remotesystem' on a fedora host as non-root is the same as 'sys remote fedora-36 rootless host'. I'll try rebasing to force the tests to re-run.

dfr added 5 commits September 20, 2022 08:36
The logic that treats running containers differently from stopped
containers is not needed on FreeBSD where the container mounts live in
a global mount namespace.

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Doug Rabson <[email protected]>
This also moves the logic for resolving paths in running and stopped
containers tp container_copy_linux.go.

On FreeBSD, we can execute the function argument to joinMountAndExec
directly using host-relative paths since the host mount namespace
includes all the container mounts.

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Doug Rabson <[email protected]>
[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Doug Rabson <[email protected]>
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Sep 21, 2022

LGTM

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Sep 21, 2022

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 21, 2022
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Sep 21, 2022

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 21, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dfr, mheon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 21, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 7a189a6 into containers:main Sep 21, 2022
@dfr dfr deleted the freebsd-copy branch September 21, 2022 14:18
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 20, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 20, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants