Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add FreeBSD support for pkg/specgen/generate #15560

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 1, 2022

Conversation

dfr
Copy link
Contributor

@dfr dfr commented Aug 31, 2022

This involved moving linux-specific code to per-platform files which also allowed some of the build stubs I added earlier to be removed. A baseline implementation of SpecGenToOCI was added which is enough to support running containers (which will be in a later and more complicated PR).

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

dfr added 4 commits August 29, 2022 13:06
The security features (selinux, apparmor, capabilities) are linux
specific.

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Doug Rabson <[email protected]>
…d add stubs.

Almost all of SpecGenToOCI deals with linux-specific aspects of the
runtime spec. Rather than try to factor this out piecemeal, I think it
is cleaner to move the whole function along with its implementation
helper functions. This also meams we don't need non-linux stubs for
functions called from oci_linux.go

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Doug Rabson <[email protected]>
… add stubs

Everthing except for hostname management is linux-specific.

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Doug Rabson <[email protected]>
[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Doug Rabson <[email protected]>
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Aug 31, 2022

LGTM
/approve
@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 31, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dfr, rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 31, 2022
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Aug 31, 2022

On the assumption that the single system test failure was a flake:
/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 31, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 31, 2022
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 1, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 009afb5 into containers:main Sep 1, 2022
@dfr dfr deleted the freebsd-specgen branch September 1, 2022 09:21
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 20, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 20, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants