-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
remove image podman no prune #15093
remove image podman no prune #15093
Conversation
go.mod
Outdated
@@ -74,3 +74,5 @@ require ( | |||
require github.com/docker/libnetwork v0.8.0-dev.2.0.20190625141545-5a177b73e316 // indirect | |||
|
|||
replace github.com/opencontainers/runc => github.com/opencontainers/runc v1.1.1-0.20220617142545-8b9452f75cbc | |||
|
|||
replace github.com/containers/common => github.com/karthikelango137/common v0.48.1-0.20220727150028-71a5d2c2db12 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to be extra sure. Before merging, we need a PR in c/common and then vendor from there.
2c9d283
to
5eaf5f3
Compare
5eaf5f3
to
97a47f5
Compare
bcf7661
to
956e9a3
Compare
a55e787
to
252c7eb
Compare
@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, but looks like you need a rebase or something, as you have a merge conflict.
252c7eb
to
18cc295
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
some vendor/rebase leftover stuff, otherwise LGTM
go.sum
Outdated
@@ -395,8 +395,13 @@ github.com/containernetworking/plugins v1.1.1/go.mod h1:Sr5TH/eBsGLXK/h71HeLfX19 | |||
github.com/containers/buildah v1.26.1-0.20220716095526-d31d27c357ab h1:NeI0DOkTf3Tn4OpdjMhMubAfTPs2oCO5jUY5wnpv4qk= | |||
github.com/containers/buildah v1.26.1-0.20220716095526-d31d27c357ab/go.mod h1:iVtQtU6a+pbETBqIzg0oAWW3gTR1ItrAihJpLFFppmA= | |||
github.com/containers/common v0.48.1-0.20220715075726-2ac10faca05a/go.mod h1:1dA7JPGoSi83kjf5H4NIrGANyLOULyvFqV1bwvYFEek= | |||
<<<<<<< HEAD |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
leftover rebase weirdness
vendor/modules.txt
Outdated
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ github.com/containers/buildah/pkg/rusage | |||
github.com/containers/buildah/pkg/sshagent | |||
github.com/containers/buildah/pkg/util | |||
github.com/containers/buildah/util | |||
# github.com/containers/common v0.49.2-0.20220804143628-dc97077782d5 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this looks like a downgrade
18cc295
to
34ce31f
Compare
Signed-off-by: Karthik Elango <[email protected]>
34ce31f
to
cc8e4d5
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL
Nice work, @karthikelango137 !
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
Great job @karthikelango137 ! :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: karthikelango137, Luap99 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
PR containers#15093 implemented support for NoPrune in the ImageRemoveOptions, this PR simply brings that also to the compat API along with regression tests. Signed-off-by: Andreas Kohn <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
Docker supports --no-prune for rmi which does not remove dangling parents of the specified image. Podman
should support the same for compatibility.
Task from #14917
Signed-off-by: Karthik Elango [email protected]
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?