Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

envVarValueResourceFieldRef: use int64 for value #14823

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 5, 2022

Conversation

Luap99
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 commented Jul 4, 2022

int can be 32 or 64 bit depending on the architecture.
The total memory is int64 so we have to use int64 for the value as
well otherwise we get an overflow on 32 bit systems.

Fixes #14819

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Fixed a bug with podman play kube on 32 bit systems where the total memory was calculated incorrectly.

Luap99 added 3 commits July 4, 2022 17:24
int can be 32 or 64 bit depending on the architecture.
The total memory is int64 so we have to use int64 for the value as
well otherwise we get an overflow on 32 bit systems.

Fixes containers#14819

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <[email protected]>
assert.Equal() already follows to pointer and compares by value so we
can just directly pass the values. This will make errors much more
obvious. Also remove the fmt.Println() since the error now contains the
values.

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <[email protected]>
Machine can only run on amd64 and arm64 platforms so we need to make
sure the test are only run on those platforms. We do not have CI checks
for this but it fails in debian build infra since debian supports many
other architectures as well.

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 4, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 4, 2022
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 5, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 5, 2022
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jul 5, 2022

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 5, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot merged commit 13479d4 into containers:main Jul 5, 2022
@Luap99 Luap99 deleted the debian-unit-tests branch July 5, 2022 13:04
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 21, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

TestEnvVarValue fails on several architectures
3 participants