-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cirrus: enable Fedora 36 aarch64 tasks on EC2 #14801
Conversation
57346a1
to
8785850
Compare
37bb6e9
to
48d1ba2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking good so far
14cd682
to
c7a7aad
Compare
9a01a58
to
2ab62ba
Compare
|
Oof, WTF. Doing some digging... |
nonono, that's just because @lsm5 tried removing something, but I guess it can't be removed. Should be easy to just add it back. |
Our VM images should be uniform across architectures. Since we're not seeing this error on the x86 tasks, something is clearly not uniform. Looking in c/automation_images, |
Okay, it looks like the |
new file: test/e2e/config_arm64.go Tests that fail on aarch64 have been skipped with `skip_if_aarch64`. Co-authored-by: Chris Evich <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ed Santiago <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <[email protected]>
@edsantiago @cevich removed that smallcontainer line and added python3-devel back. PTAL once again please, sorry about the PITA :( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/hold
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cevich, lsm5 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
It's no problem bud. |
remote is a flake which should go away as soon as #15090 merges. |
LGTM but that Thanks for your perseverance @lsm5. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
Thanks everybody for working on this. I am very excited!
/hold cancel |
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar [email protected]
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Piggybacks on #14569