Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

--userns=keep-id,nomap are not allowed in rootful mode #14532

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 8, 2022

Conversation

rhatdan
Copy link
Member

@rhatdan rhatdan commented Jun 8, 2022

Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh [email protected]

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

No

none

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 8, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

baseuid=$(egrep "${ns_user}:" /etc/subuid | cut -f2 -d:)
test ! -z ${baseuid} || skip "no IDs allocated for user ${ns_user}"
if is_rootless; then
ns_user=$(id -un)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please indent this properly

run_podman rm -t 0 --force ${cid}
@test "podman userns=keep-id" {
if is_rootless; then
user=$(id -u)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same here

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looked fine in Emacs, but it looks like tabs versus spaces. Fixed.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 8, 2022
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Jun 8, 2022

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 8, 2022
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Jun 8, 2022

The Openshift bot doesn't seem to be monitoring this, but hopefully adding LGTM will wake it

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 864d46c into containers:main Jun 8, 2022
edsantiago added a commit to edsantiago/libpod that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2022
Another easy one. Difference is that pod-create was fixed
in containers#14532 (s/ignore/not allowed/) but pod-clone was not.
I went with the fixed version.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 21, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants