Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix swagger model of InspectPodResponse #14377

Conversation

SoMuchForSubtlety
Copy link
Contributor

This PR partially addresses #14160 by fixing one instance of net.IP being represented as []uint8 in the swagger API spec. This fix does not work for the following models, because they contain arrays of net.IP.

  • ContainerNetworkConfig#dns_server
  • NetOptions#dns_server
  • NetworkConnectOptions#static_ips
  • PerNetworkOptions#static_ips
  • PodNetworkConfig#dns_server
  • PodSpecGenerator#dns_server
  • SpecGenerator#dns_server

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented May 26, 2022

You need to add [NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

@SoMuchForSubtlety SoMuchForSubtlety force-pushed the fix/pod-inspect-response branch 2 times, most recently from 3faf31a to b6aa01b Compare May 26, 2022 12:33
@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

@SoMuchForSubtlety could you rebase on current main please? The test failures are nasty flakes fixed in cb76d15. It'll be much easier to rebase & resubmit than for someone to press Re-run multiple times over the next 4-5 hours.

`net.IP` gets marshalled as `string` and not `[]uint8`

[NO TESTS NEEDED]
[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Jakob Ahrer <[email protected]>
@SoMuchForSubtlety SoMuchForSubtlety force-pushed the fix/pod-inspect-response branch from b6aa01b to 8c78141 Compare May 26, 2022 14:34
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented May 26, 2022

LGTM

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented May 26, 2022

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 26, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mheon, SoMuchForSubtlety

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 26, 2022
@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

LGTM
thanks @SoMuchForSubtlety

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 26, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit e709cc8 into containers:main May 26, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 21, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants