Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix f35 integration test network flake #14361

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 25, 2022

Conversation

Luap99
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 commented May 25, 2022

I am not 100% sure if this is actually causing the problem but I was
able to reproduce locally and this change fixed it there. Without the -n
option iptables tries to reverse lookup the ips to domain names. This is
extremely slow for unknown reasons. Given the large amount of iptables
entries due parallel test runs it will not succeed in the default 90 sec
timeout.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

I am not 100% sure if this is actually causing the problem but I was
able to reproduce locally and this change fixed it there. Without the `-n`
option iptables tries to reverse lookup the ips to domain names. This is
extremely slow for unknown reasons. Given the large amount of iptables
entries due parallel test runs it will not succeed in the default 90 sec
timeout.

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 25, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 25, 2022
@Luap99
Copy link
Member Author

Luap99 commented May 25, 2022

@edsantiago @mheon PTAL
I hope this fixes the weird network flake. I am not sure if this is actually the problem but we will find out soon if it passes on this PR.

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

Thank you!

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented May 25, 2022

LGTM

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

Fixes: #14331 (fingers crossed) (I'm adding this here, not editing the description, to see if github detects it in a comment)

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented May 25, 2022

LGTM, good catch

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

CI passed with no flakes! Huzzah!

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 25, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit e26ad50 into containers:main May 25, 2022
@Luap99 Luap99 deleted the netflake branch May 25, 2022 15:41
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 21, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants