Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump golang.org/x/crypto to 7b82a4e #13841

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 12, 2022

Conversation

lsm5
Copy link
Member

@lsm5 lsm5 commented Apr 12, 2022

Resolves: CVE-2022-27191

Podman doesn't seem to be directly affected as the logic in question
is not called.

golang.org/x/crypto@1baeb1ce contains the actual CVE fix. Using the
latest upstream commit to also include support for SHA-2.

Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar [email protected]

@mheon @mtrmac @rhatdan @baude @vrothberg @TomSweeneyRedHat PTAL
/cc @containers/podman-maintainers

Resolves: GHSA-8c26-wmh5-6g9v - CVE-2022-27191

Podman doesn't seem to be directly affected as the logic in question
is not called.

golang.org/x/crypto@1baeb1ce contains the actual CVE fix. Using the
latest upstream commit to also include support for SHA-2.

Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 12, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lsm5

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 12, 2022
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Apr 12, 2022

Test failures seem unrelated - not the same test for all 5? Restarted

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Apr 12, 2022

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 12, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 12, 2022
@lsm5
Copy link
Member Author

lsm5 commented Apr 12, 2022

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 12, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 8586b48 into containers:main Apr 12, 2022
@lsm5 lsm5 deleted the main-cve-2022-27191 branch April 14, 2022 13:47
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 21, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants