Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

apiv2 test: add regression test for #12904 #12919

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2022

Conversation

vrothberg
Copy link
Member

Add a regression test for issue #12904 to make sure that attaching with
logs=true to the compact endpoint does not blow up. Note that I did not
find a way to test the output (i.e., '123'); logs are sent in a binary
format and I did not find a way to compare the control characters.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg [email protected]

Add a regression test for issue containers#12904 to make sure that attaching with
logs=true to the compact endpoint does not blow up.  Note that I did not
find a way to test the output (i.e., '123'); logs are sent in a binary
format and I did not find a way to compare the control characters.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 19, 2022
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

@flouthoc
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 19, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: flouthoc, vrothberg, zhangguanzhang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [flouthoc,vrothberg,zhangguanzhang]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@zhangguanzhang
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jan 19, 2022

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 19, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit fa27734 into containers:main Jan 19, 2022
edsantiago added a commit to edsantiago/libpod that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2022
Followup to containers#12919, which merged while I was writing
review feedback. This actually confirms log output.
This required a minor change to the 't' helper: stripping
NUL chars from the http result.

And, while I'm at it, a bunch of cleanup for running rootless:
- set $CONTAINERS_HELPER_BINARY_DIR, so we can find rootlessport
- add a few conditionals for different expectations

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 21, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants