Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make sure netavark output is logged to the syslog #12372

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 22, 2021

Conversation

Luap99
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 commented Nov 19, 2021

What this PR does / why we need it:

Create a custom writer which logs the netavark output to logrus. This
will log to the syslog when it is enabled. Without this we get zero output from netavark on teardown.

Force iptables driver for netavark tests
Firewalld cannot be used because it can connect to the dbus api but
talks to firewalld in the host namespace. This will affact your host
badly and also causes tests to fail.

How to verify it

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Create a custom writer which logs the netavark output to logrus. This
will log to the syslog when it is enabled.

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <[email protected]>
Firewalld cannot be used because it can connect to the dbus api but
talks to firewalld in the host namespace. This will affact your host
badly and also causes tests to fail.

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 19, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 19, 2021
@Luap99
Copy link
Member Author

Luap99 commented Nov 19, 2021

@mheon PTAL

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Nov 19, 2021

LGTM

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

Changes LGTM
but tests aren't hip

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Nov 22, 2021

Both failures looked like flakes.

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 22, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 22, 2021
@Luap99
Copy link
Member Author

Luap99 commented Nov 22, 2021

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 22, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit bfc929e into containers:main Nov 22, 2021
@Luap99 Luap99 deleted the syslog-netavark branch November 22, 2021 15:39
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 22, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants