Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remote checkpoint/restore: more fixes #12342

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2021

Conversation

vrothberg
Copy link
Member

  • Support checkpoint --pre-checkpoint

  • Support checkpoint --with-previous

  • Disable restore --import-previous for the remote client since we had
    to send two files which in turn would require to tar them up and hence
    be a breaking change. Podman 4.0 would be the chance and I hope we'll
    find time before that to remote-restore prettier.

Note that I did not run over swagger yet to check whether all parameters
are actually documented due to time constraints.

Fixes: #12334
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg [email protected]

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 18, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vrothberg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 18, 2021
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

CI currently sick (see #12340) so this PR will turn red, one way or another.

* Support `checkpoint --pre-checkpoint`

* Support `checkpoint --with-previous`

* Disable `restore --import-previous` for the remote client since we had
  to send two files which in turn would require to tar them up and hence
  be a breaking change.  Podman 4.0 would be the chance and I hope we'll
  find time before that to remote-restore prettier.

Note that I did not run over swagger yet to check whether all parameters
are actually documented due to time constraints.

Fixes: containers#12334
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

LGTM. @containers/podman-maintainers PTAL and merge so we can proceed with #11795

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

LGTM
@mheon @rhatdan?

@umohnani8
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 18, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 0376e60 into containers:main Nov 18, 2021
@vrothberg vrothberg deleted the fix-12334 branch November 18, 2021 18:54
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 22, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

podman-remote checkpoint/restore tests: failing
5 participants