Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rename libpod nettypes fields #12319

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 16, 2021

Conversation

Luap99
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 commented Nov 16, 2021

What this PR does / why we need it:

Some field names are confusing. Change them so that they make more sense
to the reader.
Since these fields are only in the main branch we can safly rename them
without worrying about backwards compatibility.
Note we have to change the field names in netavark too.

How to verify it

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Some field names are confusing. Change them so that they make more sense
to the reader.
Since these fields are only in the main branch we can safely rename them
without worrying about backwards compatibility.
Note we have to change the field names in netavark too.

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 16, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 16, 2021
Luap99 added a commit to Luap99/netavark that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2021
Some field names are confusing. Change them so that they make more sense
to the reader.

I also added copmment to the types to provide more context.

also see containers/podman#12319

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <[email protected]>
Luap99 added a commit to Luap99/netavark that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2021
Some field names are confusing. Change them so that they make more sense
to the reader.

I also added comments to the types to provide more context.

also see containers/podman#12319

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <[email protected]>
@Luap99
Copy link
Member Author

Luap99 commented Nov 16, 2021

netavark PR: containers/netavark#79

@baude
Copy link
Member

baude commented Nov 16, 2021

LGTM

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

LGTM
and happy green test buttons

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Nov 16, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 16, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit c661664 into containers:main Nov 16, 2021
@Luap99 Luap99 deleted the nettypes-rename branch November 17, 2021 11:17
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 22, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants