-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enable 'podman run --memory-swappiness=0' #12272
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ | ||
package integration | ||
|
||
import ( | ||
"fmt" | ||
"os" | ||
"strconv" | ||
|
||
|
@@ -67,13 +68,17 @@ var _ = Describe("Podman run memory", func() { | |
Expect(session.OutputToString()).To(Equal("41943040")) | ||
}) | ||
|
||
It("podman run memory-swappiness test", func() { | ||
SkipIfCgroupV2("memory-swappiness not supported on cgroupV2") | ||
session := podmanTest.Podman([]string{"run", "--memory-swappiness=15", ALPINE, "cat", "/sys/fs/cgroup/memory/memory.swappiness"}) | ||
session.WaitWithDefaultTimeout() | ||
Expect(session).Should(Exit(0)) | ||
Expect(session.OutputToString()).To(Equal("15")) | ||
}) | ||
for _, limit := range []string{"0", "15", "100"} { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. is there no way to reverse this syntax? I feel like its better to declare the test once and run the same code with different values inside of the single test There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think separated tests makes it easy to find which case fails. |
||
limit := limit // Keep this value in a proper scope | ||
testName := fmt.Sprintf("podman run memory-swappiness test(%s)", limit) | ||
It(testName, func() { | ||
SkipIfCgroupV2("memory-swappiness not supported on cgroupV2") | ||
session := podmanTest.Podman([]string{"run", fmt.Sprintf("--memory-swappiness=%s", limit), ALPINE, "cat", "/sys/fs/cgroup/memory/memory.swappiness"}) | ||
session.WaitWithDefaultTimeout() | ||
Expect(session).Should(Exit(0)) | ||
Expect(session.OutputToString()).To(Equal(limit)) | ||
}) | ||
} | ||
|
||
It("podman run kernel-memory test", func() { | ||
if podmanTest.Host.Distribution == "ubuntu" { | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like the idea of this, but would it make more sense to make this a struct rather than a function? A struct would more closely resemble our other create options while a function more closely represents our specgenerator process. either way this is a good way to differentiate infra.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A new struct for an infra container would be helpful to clarify what parameter is required for creating an infra container. But, I'm not sure how much change is necessary to introduce the new struct. I chose a function to fix this issue with the smaller change.