Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

runtime: check for pause pid existence #12111

Merged

Conversation

giuseppe
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:

drop undesired warning message

How to verify it

podman system reset -f doesn't complain about moving the pause process

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #12065

Special notes for your reviewer:

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 27, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 27, 2021
check that the pause pid exists before trying to move it to a separate
scope.

Closes: containers#12065

Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]>
@giuseppe giuseppe force-pushed the fix-warning-move-pause-process branch from 6b22331 to 6b3b0a1 Compare October 27, 2021 09:25
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

I restarted the two build jobs; looked like a flake to me.

unified, err := cgroups.IsCgroup2UnifiedMode()
if err != nil {
unified, err2 := cgroups.IsCgroup2UnifiedMode()
if err2 != nil {
logrus.Warnf("Failed to detect if running with cgroup unified: %v", err)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this be err2

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think in this case we want to report the original error of moving the PID to a different scope

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Oct 27, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 27, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 6caf5e3 into containers:main Oct 27, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 22, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Failed to add pause process to systemd sandbox cgroup
6 participants