-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
runtime: check for pause pid existence #12111
runtime: check for pause pid existence #12111
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]>
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
check that the pause pid exists before trying to move it to a separate scope. Closes: containers#12065 Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]>
6b22331
to
6b3b0a1
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
I restarted the two build jobs; looked like a flake to me.
unified, err := cgroups.IsCgroup2UnifiedMode() | ||
if err != nil { | ||
unified, err2 := cgroups.IsCgroup2UnifiedMode() | ||
if err2 != nil { | ||
logrus.Warnf("Failed to detect if running with cgroup unified: %v", err) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't this be err2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think in this case we want to report the original error of moving the PID to a different scope
/lgtm |
What this PR does / why we need it:
drop undesired warning message
How to verify it
podman system reset -f
doesn't complain about moving the pause processWhich issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #12065
Special notes for your reviewer: