Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use exponential backoff when waiting for a journal entry #12017

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 20, 2021

Conversation

nalind
Copy link
Member

@nalind nalind commented Oct 18, 2021

What this PR does / why we need it:

When looking for a cursor that matches the first journal entry for a given container, wait and try to find it using exponential backoff.

How to verify it

The precise timing required makes this difficult to write an automated test for CI.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

None

Special notes for your reviewer:

This brings us in line with code comments, waiting up to 700ms instead of the previous 300ms.

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Oct 18, 2021

Need to add [NO NEW TESTS NEEDED] Flag.

When looking for a cursor that matches the first journal entry for a
given container, wait and try to find it using exponential backoff.

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Nalin Dahyabhai <[email protected]>
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Oct 18, 2021

Change LGTM

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Oct 18, 2021

/approve
/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 18, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 18, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: nalind, rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Oct 18, 2021
@nalind
Copy link
Member Author

nalind commented Oct 19, 2021

Given #12029, we may need to increase how long we wait, or rework how this works entirely.

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 20, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 97f051f into containers:main Oct 20, 2021
@nalind nalind deleted the exponential branch October 25, 2021 17:25
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 22, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants