Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

container inspect: improve error handling #11476

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 8, 2021

Conversation

vrothberg
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg commented Sep 8, 2021

Improve the error handling of container inspect to properly handle
when the container has been removed between the lookup and the
inspect. That will yield the correct "no such object" error message in
inspect.

[NO TESTS NEEDED] since I do not know a reliable and cheap
reproducer. It's fixing a CI flake, so there's already an indicator.

Fixes: #11392
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg [email protected]

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 8, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vrothberg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 8, 2021
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Sep 8, 2021

LGTM

Improve the error handling of `container inspect` to properly handle
when the container has been removed _between_ the lookup and the
inspect.  That will yield the correct "no such object" error message in
`inspect`.

[NO TESTS NEEDED] since I do not know have a reliable and cheap
reproducer.  It's fixing a CI flake, so there's already an indicator.

Fixes: containers#11392
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

@Luap99 PTanotherL

@Luap99
Copy link
Member

Luap99 commented Sep 8, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 8, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit d68e429 into containers:main Sep 8, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 22, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

podman inspect: error getting graph driver info: stat/ENOENT
4 participants