Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix play kube --network options #11468

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 8, 2021

Conversation

Luap99
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 commented Sep 7, 2021

Commit 092902b introduced advanced network options for podman play
kube. However this never worked because it unconditionally set the
network mode to bridge after it parsed the network option.

Added a test to ensure the correct mode is set.

Truly fixes #10807

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 7, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 7, 2021
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Sep 7, 2021

LGTM
@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Sep 7, 2021

LGTM. System tests are red.

Commit 092902b introduced advanced network options for podman play
kube. However this never worked because it unconditionally set the
network mode to bridge after it parsed the network option.

Added a test to ensure the correct mode is set.

Truly fixes containers#10807

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <[email protected]>
@Luap99
Copy link
Member Author

Luap99 commented Sep 8, 2021

Tests are fixed. Using -l will obviously not work on the remote client.

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Sep 8, 2021

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 8, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 8, 2021
@Luap99
Copy link
Member Author

Luap99 commented Sep 8, 2021

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 8, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 558ba1b into containers:main Sep 8, 2021
@Luap99 Luap99 deleted the play-kube-slirp branch September 8, 2021 11:56
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 22, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

podman play kube --network flag
4 participants