Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Shell completion for --format with anonymous fields #11337

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 27, 2021

Conversation

Luap99
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 commented Aug 27, 2021

In commit d81021e I introduced shell completion for the --format
flag. This is a very nice way to complete go template field names.
However it did not work correct for anonymous fields. In this case the
child fields can be accessed directly from the parent.

For example:

type Anonymous struct {
   Field1 string
   Field2 string
   ...
}

type MyType struct {
    Anonymous
}

var s = MyType{}

Now if you want to access a field from the Anonymous struct you can just
do s.Field1. The same is allowed for go templates, using {{.Field1}}
should work. This commit adds this functionality, if the field is anonymous
read the child field names recursively and add them to the suggestions.

In commit d81021e I introduced shell completion for the `--format`
flag. This is a very nice way to complete go template field names.
However it did not work correct for anonymous fields. In this case the
child fields can be accessed directly from the parent.

For example:
```
type Anonymous struct {
   Field1 string
   Field2 string
   ...
}

type MyType struct {
    Anonymous
}

var s = MyType{}
```

Now if you want to access a field from the Anonymous struct you can just
do `s.Field1`. The same is allowed for go templates, using `{{.Field1}}`
should work. This commit adds this functionality, if the field is anonymous
read the child field names recursively and add them to the suggestions.

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Aug 27, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 27, 2021
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Aug 27, 2021

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 27, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99, rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 27, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 6f61ef8 into containers:main Aug 27, 2021
@Luap99 Luap99 deleted the anon-template branch August 27, 2021 11:24
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 22, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants