Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make sure that signal buffers are sufficiently big #11240

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 17, 2021

Conversation

vrothberg
Copy link
Member

Dealing with os.Signal channels seems more like an art than science
since signals may get lost. os.Notify doesn't block on an unbuffered
channel, so users are expected to know what they're doing or hope for
the best.

In the recent past, I've seen a number of flakes and BZs on non-amd64
architectures where I was under the impression that signals may got
lost, for instance, during stop and exec.

[NO TESTS NEEDED] since this is art.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg [email protected]

@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL 🎨

Dealing with os.Signal channels seems more like an art than science
since signals may get lost.  os.Notify doesn't block on an unbuffered
channel, so users are expected to know what they're doing or hope for
the best.

In the recent past, I've seen a number of flakes and BZs on non-amd64
architectures where I was under the impression that signals may got
lost, for instance, during stop and exec.

[NO TESTS NEEDED] since this is art.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 17, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vrothberg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 17, 2021
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Aug 17, 2021

LGTM

@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

@edsantiago this may (or may not) help resolve some of the multi-arch testing.

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

Seems worth a try - thank you.

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Aug 17, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 17, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot merged commit de4d7b2 into containers:main Aug 17, 2021
@vrothberg vrothberg deleted the art branch August 17, 2021 13:14
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 22, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants