Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CNI-in-slirp4netns: fix bind-mount for /run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolv.conf #10936

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2021

Conversation

AkihiroSuda
Copy link
Collaborator

@AkihiroSuda AkihiroSuda commented Jul 15, 2021

Fix #10929 [Regression in 3.2.0] CNI-in-slirp4netns DNS gets broken when running a rootful container after running a rootless container

When /etc/resolv.conf on the host is a symlink to /run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolv.conf, we have to mount an empty filesystem on /run/systemd/resolve in the child namespace, so as to isolate the directory from the host mount namespace.

Otherwise our bind-mount for /run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolv.conf is unmounted when systemd-resolved unlinks and recreates /run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolv.conf on the host.


Cherry-picking this to v3.2 requires cherry-picking #10865

…lv.conf

Fix issue 10929 : `[Regression in 3.2.0] CNI-in-slirp4netns DNS gets broken when running a rootful container after running a rootless container`

When /etc/resolv.conf on the host is a symlink to /run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolv.conf,
we have to mount an empty filesystem on /run/systemd/resolve in the child namespace,
so as to isolate the directory from the host mount namespace.

Otherwise our bind-mount for /run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolv.conf is unmounted
when systemd-resolved unlinks and recreates /run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolv.conf on the host.

[NO TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 15, 2021
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, @AkihiroSuda!

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 15, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 15, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AkihiroSuda, Luap99, vrothberg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@vrothberg
Copy link
Member

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 15, 2021
@Luap99
Copy link
Member

Luap99 commented Jul 15, 2021

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 15, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 6124588 into containers:main Jul 15, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 22, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. CNI Bug with CNI networking for root containers lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. rootless
Projects
None yet
4 participants