Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

System tests: the continuing multiarch saga #10646

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2021

Conversation

edsantiago
Copy link
Member

TL;DR podman needs "arm64" as arch, not "arm64v8".

Unexpurgated version: docker.io publishes ${ARCH}/alpine for
several values of ARCH. Unfortunately, the arm64 one is
called "arm64v8", which is sensible, but podman needs the
--arch value of the manifest to be exactly "arm64". So we
need to special-case this value in our loop. Do so, and
build/publish a new 20210610 testimage. Use that in tests
moving forward.

And, since we need to jump through the same hoops to build
the nonlocal image, include it in the build loop instead
of as a tacked-on comment. Try to be helpful by determining
the next-available numeric tag.

And: don't push anything by default. Instead, just tell
the user what buildah-push commands to run.

And: refactor $PODMAN_NONLOCAL_IMAGE_TAG, to make it easier
for the RHEL-arch-testing folx to override using envariables
instead of inplace-sed. (Not that they should ever need to
override again, because this is the final multiarch commit
that should be forevermore perfect and need no further commits
ever again).

And, finally, bump up to latest alpine/busybox images.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago [email protected]

TL;DR podman needs "arm64" as arch, not "arm64v8".

Unexpurgated version: docker.io publishes ${ARCH}/alpine for
several values of ARCH. Unfortunately, the arm64 one is
called "arm64v8", which is sensible, but podman needs the
--arch value of the manifest to be exactly "arm64". So we
need to special-case this value in our loop. Do so, and
build/publish a new 20210610 testimage. Use that in tests
moving forward.

And, since we need to jump through the same hoops to build
the nonlocal image, include it in the build loop instead
of as a tacked-on comment. Try to be helpful by determining
the next-available numeric tag.

And: don't push anything by default. Instead, just tell
the user what buildah-push commands to run.

And: refactor $PODMAN_NONLOCAL_IMAGE_TAG, to make it easier
for the RHEL-arch-testing folx to override using envariables
instead of inplace-sed. (Not that they should ever need to
override again, because this is the final multiarch commit
that should be forevermore perfect and need no further commits
ever again).

And, finally, bump up to latest alpine/busybox images.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 10, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: edsantiago

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 10, 2021
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jun 10, 2021

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 11, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 08e39fe into containers:master Jun 11, 2021
@edsantiago edsantiago deleted the arm64 branch June 16, 2022 21:44
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 21, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants