Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

auto-update tests: various fixes #10592

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 8, 2021

Conversation

edsantiago
Copy link
Member

Followup to #9740. Nice work, but the _confirm_update() helper
was dangerously broken and I just wasn't able to communicate
that. Given the time zone difference, and my weekly time cost
in reviewing, it's easier for me to fix it myself. (The problem
is that the function was a complete NOP, which would lead to
flakes).

Also: got rid of some clutter, restructured a few minor places
for maintainability.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago [email protected]

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 7, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: edsantiago

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 7, 2021
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jun 7, 2021

LGTM

@edsantiago edsantiago force-pushed the bats branch 2 times, most recently from 1b1321b to f2c2748 Compare June 8, 2021 00:25
Followup to containers#9740. Nice work, but the _confirm_update() helper
was dangerously broken and I just wasn't able to communicate
that. Given the time zone difference, and my weekly time cost
in reviewing, it's easier for me to fix it myself. (The problem
is that the function was a complete NOP, which would lead to
flakes).

Also: got rid of some clutter, restructured a few minor places
for maintainability.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <[email protected]>
while [[ $timeout -gt 0 ]]; do
run_podman '?' inspect --format "{{.Image}}" $cname
if [[ $status != 0 ]]; then
if [[ $output =~ (no such object|does not exist in database): ]]; then
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was the hardest part to get right. Sometimes it's one of those errors, sometimes the other.

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 8, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 9a3a732 into containers:master Jun 8, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 23, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 23, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants