Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use request context instead of background #10519

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 1, 2021

Conversation

matejvasek
Copy link
Contributor

This prevents goroutine leak:
If background context were used then push operation would continue even
if client aborted request by closing connection.

Signed-off-by: Matej Vasek [email protected]

This prevents goroutine leak:
If background context were used then push operation would continue even
if client aborted request by closing connection.

[NO TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Matej Vasek <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jun 1, 2021

/approve
/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 1, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 1, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 1, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: matejvasek, rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 1, 2021
@@ -160,43 +145,50 @@ loop: // break out of for/select infinite loop
}
report.ID = e.Artifact.Digest.Encoded()[0:12]
if err := enc.Encode(report); err != nil {
errorWriter.Write([]byte(err.Error()))
logrus.Warnf("Failed to json encode error %q", err.Error())
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor nit, but if this needs other changes, can you swap this to an Errorf?

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jun 1, 2021

/lgtm
Lets do this in a separate PR

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jun 1, 2021

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 1, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit ce2b331 into containers:master Jun 1, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 23, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 23, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants